Find out your university ranking and what are the best & worst courses in your school
ExploreLatest Course Reviews
2025-01-29
Professor: STAFF
depends. Varies according to the speaker
2025-01-24
Professor: William Tam
Mediocre, reading PPT most of the time.
2025-01-23
Professor: Professor AU Wing-tung Winton
Extremely bad time management. In later classes, we have to use tutorial time to teach because we were so behind on progress. On the other hand, the professor is very enthusiastic and the class is engaging. He often demonstrates concepts clearly with examples.
The TA gives detailed feedback on assignments. Some tutorial sessions are consultation session and you can ask for feedback there too.
Lectures or tutorials do not require attendance.
2025-01-21
Professor: Ata GHADEI
Mediocre teaching, monotone, reads from lecture notes. Not inspiring. Lectures and tutorials do not take attendance. IMO it is better to use your time to read the lecture notes/textbook yourself instead of attending lectures.
Gives tips on midterm/final exam that turn out to be misleading. For example, the professor said that the quiz questions would only test conceptual knowledge, but some actual questions test on specific details (e.g. The percentage of people with a certain disorder).
Workload relatively heavy, compared to other PSYC electives
2025-01-15
Professor: Dr. Liqiang HUANG
Professor is passionate about the topic. In every lesson, he asks students to answer his questions, do demonstrations and show videos to make class more lively. At the end, he asks group discussion questions, which are helpful to reflect on as those types of questions appear in the exams.
Lecture notes are very clear. It explains and demonstrates a concept clearly with examples.
For any non-major students, I recommend taking PSYC2010 and PSYC2020 first as knowledge of experimental methods will be useful for the exams.
2025-01-15
Professor: Ms LI Lin
Fair teaching skills, clearly states expectations of the assignment. She also lets us practise interview questions before the actual assessment. Class atmosphere is relaxing, lets us discuss in groups, then answer her questions during the lesson. However, even though she promised to return the scores on assignments, she never did so.
2025-01-15
Professor: Ayuen
Ayuen 係nice 嘅,但係佢係唔會提你上lab /tut㗎,大個啦,呢個唔係1042呀,要自己留意時間啦
2025-01-11
Professor: CHAN Ping Shing Ben
課程設計得好差,將一個壓縮版嘅精算course (ks係soa exam FM同埋LTAM嘅materials嚟) 放喺一個唔expect會有任何精算底子嘅course入面 (要知道統計同精算係兩樣野黎),人地ifaa就算係神科,都唔可能會整個濃縮版俾人去讀,按照呢科嘅structure人地係用三個course教 (i.e. FINA2200 for exam FM,FINA3221, FINA3222 for exam LTAM) ,workload極重 + prof好爛grade問你死未:)真係想讀呢科超級建議讀咗FINA2200先,起碼識咗midterm之前嘅topics先 (利申讀過FINA2200,老師教得好詳細,你係會知道自己學緊咩)
2025-01-09
Professor: Dr Ng Tsz Yan
對於中文基礎不錯的同學來說,課堂上的內容對寫作幫助有限,惟上課尚算有趣。
2025-01-09
Professor: Dr Hoi Wan Heng, Sandy
Sandy is really nice and gives constructive feedback for reflective essay and term paper outlines that helped me improve. She explains complicated concepts clearly, and tutorials were well-structured, despite her English with a strong Cantonese accent. Although I am uninterested in science, I enjoyed Sandy’s tutorials.
2025-01-09
Professor: Dr Lee Kenneth Justin
Difficult to comment. I would say it’s not suitable for me, but it might be suitable for some people.
2025-01-09
Professor: Prof Lin Yunduan
Prof Lin is a new professor who just came to CUHK in 2024/25; She is kind and allows flexibility in exam arrangements; lectures are useful but little boring; assignments are also well-designed and very useful for revision.
2025-01-09
Professor: Dr Tsui Po Yung, Anna
This is my second course taught by Anna - she’s really nice. Her lectures are interesting as she always uses real-life business cases to explain different HR functions. Will learn a lot even if you do not plan to become an HR, or even if you are not a business student. She also shares a lot of her past experience working as an HR specialist. Highly recommended unless you want to skip lectures.
2025-01-03
Professor: thomas leung
prof just reading out the powerpoint, spending 25-40 minutes to do self-studying is better
2024-12-17
Professor: Lau Ka William
teach too fast ,difficult to follow
2024-12-09
Professor: Prof Kwok Wing CHOW, Prof Kenneth Kin Yip WONG, Dr Yik Chung WU
The lectures are generally interesting and not so difficult if you can spend some time on revision.
2024-12-09
Professor: Dr M. Hafiz
Mostly likely follow the course book to teach; sometimes shares his past experience in school counselling
2024-11-29
Professor: Chan Kwan Nok
Both the professor and tutorial staff are chill
2024-10-16
Professor: Ms. CHEUNG Ka-yee, Crystal
樂於幫助同學
幾好人
2024-10-02
Professor: Cao Yixin
the teaching is soooooooooooooo bad...... He just saying something that no one can understand and then just go ahead. Don't wish you can learn something in the lecture and the lecture material is kind of abstract..... TBH I cannot understand what he try to deliver...... Just use coursera and youtube(x
2024-09-18
Professor: Kim Cheon Mok, John
Caring and fun
2024-09-11
Professor: Jiang XIA
He teaches like shit, mainly due to his inability to explain basic concepts clearly. As a result, he over-complicates even the simplest organic chemistry concept. Also, his English has a heavy Chinese accent and he never speaks into the microphone.
2024-09-10
Professor: Michael Yu Ruisi
the lecturer just read the ppt
2024-09-10
Professor: Michael Yu Ruisi
Networking is more important in this course. You know what I mean
2024-08-15
Professor: CHAN Chi Ming
老師友善好人,幽默風趣,用心教學,鼓勵學生,課堂輕鬆愉快
2024-08-15
Professor: CHEUNG Wai Kit
老師友善好人,有耐心,用心教學,教到你識,課堂氣氛輕鬆愉快
2024-08-15
Professor: Tsang Heung Kam
老師非常友善好人,有耐心;課堂氣氛輕鬆愉快,內容有趣,學到新知識。
2024-08-08
Professor: CHOW, Carol P.H.
She admitted that she was NOT GOOD AT AUDIO/SOUND. She and the TAs only taught this session with less than one lecture of sound narrative theories plus around two lectures of practical skills on how to record and edit recordings. Yet, she expected students to combine soundscapes, human voices and music into the audio assignment with perfect timing, making every second meaningful. Some classmates and I agreed that we couldn’t grasp the essence of her teaching.
Moreover, handing in 3 assignments in 7 weeks was very DEMANDING. If you want to start working on the assignments when all content has been taught, you only have ONE WEEK to complete TWO ASSIGNMENTS. I hope that it will be better next year.
I took this course during summer semester, with whole day lesson. If the lecturer remains the same, and it is whole day lesson in summer, I recommend every student taking this course to BRING YOUR OWN LUNCHBOXES, as there will likely be CLASSWORK DURING LUNCHTIME.
She strongly tend to FORCE HER RULES, AESTHETIC STANDARDS AND WORD VIEWS ON STUDENT’S WORKS, and be very critical on grading. See from above for her worldviews.
2024-08-01
Professor: Professor TSAO King Kwun
The professor shares a large variety of examples from different policy areas to demonstrate the skills involved in comparative policy. Through hands-on practice in the group presentation and individual research paper, students can get a better understanding through interactive experiences.
2024-07-12
Professor: Professor Jin SUN
Professor Sun has claims he will teach a lot about the global sociology and that he will invite guest lecturers during the course so students can establish a connection and success in the financial industry. In order to ensure his course not being cancelled, he will teach "normally" with PowerPoint. However, this is absolutely a false promise and borderline deception with intent. After the add-drop period, he has completely changed his teaching attitutde. None of the guest lecturers as claimed in the course outline has ever shown up to class, but instead it is about often an 1 hour interview clip from Youtube! He no longer uses PowerPoint to teach, but rather kept on broadcasting Youtube videos and waste most of the class time on students' presentation. He even disrespect the students and constantly make fun of their presentations and insulting the students' supposed "lack of knowledge" on the subject matter when he is the one who has never taught anything in class. For example, he always play on his phone throughout the students present presentation (e.g., texting, watching video, or web surfing) and then afterwards spend the entire Q&A making the presenters feeling humiliated. In short, I found this course has serious teaching quality problems to the point it has become the instructor is rather using the students for his selfish gains for tenure-track promotion, so therefore, I would recommend the students to choose other UGEC courses and have far less confidence with this course.
2024-07-11
Professor: Cherry Lam To Kam
Dr. Lam taught the lesson in a strict and monotonous manner. For discussions, she will arrange everyone into groups and let every group share their thoughts groupwise. She is an experienced lecturer, so she knows how to deal with texts and also discussions. However, that is not the case for essays(TP and RJ), as she only wants an essay stream that she thinks is correct. Otherwise, you are very possibly subjected to a bad grade. Essays, in my opinion, should be open and free to write what you think is right, especially if you are discussing philosophical and abstract concepts, and as long as it is logically sound and grammatically graceful, it is perfectly fine. Yet, in her class, you are quite limited to writing freely; you should write the one idea that she thinks is right instead of what you think is justifiable. Still, I am happy to take the class because I believe I learned from the texts.
2024-06-16
Professor: Angela Tong
Lecturer good, lab ta bad
2024-06-16
Professor: SK Lee
Don’t teach in class
2024-06-10
Professor: Prof. HALL Stephen
A very hardworking professor, answered every question.
2024-06-05
Professor: YAM Kwan Mei
teaching skills okay la; too many in-class activities which altogether only account for 10% of the total grade, seriously overrun.
2024-05-31
Professor: Hugo Ip
taught in cantonese, practical but technical analysis is somehow not that useful in reality
2024-05-31
Professor: Professor WANG Sibo
recordings are provided
2024-05-31
Professor: Ms. Chan Sin Han Catalina
Mediocre, despite what the course outline says, the lessons are not interactive, even in Q&A. Most of the time it's just the teacher talking without student input. Plus, the teacher show bias towards certain topics. However, she is friendly most of the time and will answer your questions on assignments.
2024-05-30
Professor: Kim Cheon Mok, John
bad,讀ppt
CUHK
UGFH1000 In Dialogue With Humanity
Shared by CTK1105
2025-02-10
Professor: Dr. LI Chun Hong
風趣幽默,世一